Articles – The Investment Journal

The situation in the Middle East just got a lot more real…

Over the weekend, U.S. forces launched airstrikes on three nuclear facilities inside Iran. It wasn’t a warning shot—it was a message, and the market heard it loud and clear.

Crude prices surged overnight as fears mounted that Iran could retaliate by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical oil chokepoint.

JPMorgan analysts wasted no time issuing a bold projection: if the conflict escalates and the strait is shut down, oil could spike to $120–130 per barrel.

Let’s be clear: this isn’t some doomsday speculation… Roughly 20% of the world’s oil moves through that waterway.

If tankers stop sailing, global supply tightens overnight—and countries will scramble to secure barrels. That’s when domestic producers in the U.S. step into the spotlight.

This is a potential supercycle moment for U.S. shale—and investors who know where to look could lock in big gains…

Devon Energy: The Giant That Gets Stronger in a Crisis

Start with Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN), one of the top-tier U.S. oil producers by output and efficiency.

Devon pumps over 800,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day from massive holdings in the Permian, Anadarko, and Eagle Ford basins. These are mature, high-productivity plays with low decline rates, and Devon’s break-even price hovers around $45 per barrel.

In Q1 2025, Devon generated a staggering $1 billion in free cash flow with oil in the mid-$70s. Now imagine what that looks like with WTI at $130…

We’re talking about potentially doubling free cash flow, which the company can use to reward shareholders through buybacks, dividends, or even tuck-in acquisitions to expand its footprint.

Devon isn’t chasing growth for growth’s sake. Management is committed to capital discipline, with a net debt-to-EBITDAX ratio of just 1.0x and a firm grip on operating costs.

That gives them the flexibility to ramp up production or simply rake in higher profits. Either way, shareholders win.

Civitas Resources: The Mid-Cap with Momentum

Next, we turn to Civitas Resources (NYSE: CIVI), a fast-rising mid-cap producer that’s built a reputation for operating efficiently in the Permian Basin.

After recent acquisitions, Civitas has grown its oil production to more than 150,000 barrels per day, and it’s using smart hedging strategies to lock in prices and minimize downside.

Civitas is no stranger to volatility, and they’ve positioned themselves well for this kind of breakout…

The company was already free cash flow positive at $70 oil—at $130, they could be printing money. In 2024, Civitas guided for over $1.1 billion in free cash flow at current prices.

Higher crude could turn that into a war chest.

What makes Civitas especially attractive is its capital allocation. Rather than blowing cash on overexpansion, it has been focused on shareholder returns through dividends and share repurchases.

If oil prices surge, you can expect more of the same—plus a potential step up in drilling activity that could push production even higher in a very short time frame.

Civitas is also incredibly lean…

It runs a tight ship with low overhead, meaning more of that revenue falls straight to the bottom line. In a high-price oil environment, that kind of efficiency becomes a powerful profit engine.

Prairie Operating Company: The Small-Cap Sleeper Hit

Now for the wild card that’s not so wild—Prairie Operating Company (NASDAQ: PROP)…

This is the kind of stock that most institutional investors won’t touch until it’s already doubled. But if you’re looking for maximum leverage to higher oil prices, this tiny Denver-based operator could be your moonshot.

Prairie recently completed a $603 million acquisition of DJ Basin assets from Bayswater Exploration, transforming it overnight into a legitimate small-cap producer.

Its daily output now tops 25,000 barrels of oil equivalent, and it controls more than 55,000 net acres with around 600 high-quality drilling locations.

That’s the kind of inventory you want when prices go vertical.

The company’s 2025 EBITDA guidance sits between $350–370 million based on current pricing around $60 a barrel.

If oil jumps to $120–130, those numbers could easily and quickly blow past $500 million, fueling rapid expansion…

And with a market cap still under $200 million, it wouldn’t take much for the stock to rerate—hard.

Prairie’s low breakeven costs, nimble structure, and expanding production base make it one of the most potentially explosive small-cap oil names in the market right now.

The upside is huge—and the risks are pretty minimal thanks to tight operations and a focus on expanding shareholder value..

The Big Picture: U.S. Shale Reclaims the Throne

For the last several years, U.S. oil producers have kept their heads down…

They’ve cut costs, sold off junk assets, and gotten lean. And Wall Street mostly ignored them, favoring tech and AI and all the shiny objects with flashier narratives.

But none of that matters if the world can’t keep the lights on.

If oil hits $120 or higher, cash will start pouring into the sector again.

Investors looking for stable income will chase Devon.

Growth-minded funds will rediscover Civitas.

And savvy traders hunting for 5x or even 10x returns will start piling into names like Prairie.

And here’s the kicker: these companies don’t need oil to stay at $130 forever.

Even a six-month spike would generate windfall profits. And if prices stabilize at $100 or even $90? These firms are still minting money.

This isn’t about timing the top…

It’s about positioning ahead of a squeeze—and letting disciplined U.S. operators do what they do best: extract maximum profit from the ground up.

The Bottom Line: The Window Is Narrow, but the Potential Is Massive

Nobody knows how long this current conflict will last…

Iran could respond with restraint—or it could retaliate tomorrow and trigger a full-blown regional escalation. But the market is already pricing in risk, and history tells us that energy shocks of this scale don’t go away quietly.

If oil surges, U.S. producers will benefit. Some more than others.

Devon offers scale and predictability. Civitas combines discipline with growth potential.

And Prairie Operating Company? That’s your potentially extreme high-reward play on a market that could be on the edge of a seismic shift.

Don’t wait for CNBC to tell you it’s happening. By then, the big money will already be in.

Now’s your chance to get ahead of it.

Neither The Investment Journal nor the author have a financial position in any of the companies mentioned in this article. An affiliate of The Investment Journal has been retained for marketing services by Prairie Operating Co. between June and August, 2025; however, this is not a sponsored post. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.

If you’ve glanced at oil prices recently, you probably noticed they’re on the move — and not in a small way. After months of relatively stable crude prices, the market has suddenly snapped to attention as tensions between Israel and Iran heat up, sending both WTI and Brent crude soaring. Investors are waking up to what seasoned commodity traders already know: nothing rattles global oil markets like conflict in the Middle East.

But here’s the twist — while the drama plays out half a world away, the biggest winners may be oil producers right here in the United States.

Let’s break down why this conflict is pushing prices higher, and how U.S.-focused companies — especially Devon Energy, U.S. Energy Corp., and Prairie Operating Company — are perfectly positioned to capitalize on this volatility.

When Missiles Fly, Oil Rallies

The Middle East has long been a powder keg, but the current standoff between Israel and Iran is dangerously close to boiling over. In just the past few weeks, both countries have launched strikes against each other’s critical infrastructure — with rumors swirling that Iran may attempt to choke off the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow passageway through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil supply flows daily.

An image of a map of the Strait of Hormuz as well as a chart depicting the percentage of global oil shipments transported through the Straight each day. Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration and ClipperData, Inc.

Even the threat of disruption in that region sends shockwaves through global markets. Why? Because oil, unlike most commodities, is deeply intertwined with geopolitics. When producers or transport routes are at risk, traders rush to price in that uncertainty — and that means higher prices across the board.

As this latest conflict escalates, it’s not just a regional issue. It’s a global supply risk. And when global supply is in question, demand shifts to where oil is safest and most accessible: the good old U.S. of A.

Domestic Oil Is Suddenly Worth a Whole Lot More

What investors are realizing — and what you should be paying close attention to — is that U.S.-based oil production becomes far more valuable in times like this. It’s not subject to international shipping lanes, foreign sanctions, or political sabotage. It’s drilled, piped, refined, and sold domestically.

And that’s why the spotlight is turning toward smaller, more nimble U.S. producers that operate exclusively on American soil. They don’t have to worry about supply chains being bombed or refineries being targeted. They just need to keep pumping — and enjoy the rising prices.

Let’s look at three companies that are about to ride this wave.

Devon Energy: The Established Powerhouse

Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN) is far from a penny stock — it’s a heavyweight in the U.S. oil patch. With operations across the Permian Basin, Eagle Ford, Anadarko Basin, and Powder River, Devon has one of the most diversified domestic asset portfolios in the industry. It’s a major producer, churning out more than 800,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.

But here’s the key: it’s all U.S.-based…

An image of a recent map of Devon Energy’s domestic oil production asset base. Source: Devon Energy Q3 2023 Earnings Presentation

That means Devon gets the full benefit of higher oil prices without taking on the geopolitical risk that international producers face. While oil majors with global exposure have to worry about shipping routes and foreign governments, Devon just keeps drilling — and banking higher profits.

The company has been laser-focused on shareholder returns lately, with billions in free cash flow and a generous dividend. Rising oil prices only supercharge those cash flows, giving Devon more ammunition to return value to investors.

U.S. Energy Corp.: The Underdog with Upside

Now, let’s shift to a much smaller name with big leverage to rising prices — U.S. Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: USEG). This is a lean, nimble oil and gas company operating exclusively in the United States, with a focus on low-decline, high-margin assets in the Rockies and Gulf Coast.

An image of the U.S. Energy Corp. logo Source: U.S. Energy Corp. Investor Relations

Unlike some overextended peers, USEG has no debt and a clean balance sheet, which gives it room to grow production without financial strain. Its current production may be modest — just over 1,000 barrels per day — but when oil prices spike, even small volumes can generate serious cash for companies like this.

The beauty of a small player like USEG is that it’s pure. It doesn’t have downstream assets, international complications, or sprawling corporate overhead. It just drills, sells oil, and keeps the profits. And when the price per barrel jumps like it is now, those profits can rise exponentially.

In a high-volatility market, small domestic oil producers are often the fastest movers — and USEG fits that profile perfectly.

Prairie Operating Company: The Newcomer with Explosive Growth

Finally, we have Prairie Operating Company (NASDAQ: PROP), a newer name that’s starting to attract serious investor interest — and for good reason.

PROP operates primarily in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin, one of the most prolific onshore basins in the U.S. While still early in its growth curve, the company has aggressive plans for 2025: it expects to bring 25–28 new wells online and ramp production up to 7,000–8,000 barrels per day — nearly triple its 2024 output.

That kind of growth is impressive on its own, but in a rising oil price environment, it becomes potentially explosive. PROP is guiding for more than $100 million in EBITDA next year — and that estimate could prove conservative if oil continues its upward march.

For investors looking for a high-upside domestic play with momentum on its side, Prairie might be the dark horse that delivers the biggest gains.

The Takeaway: This Is America’s Energy Moment

While international oil producers scramble to manage risk in the Middle East, American companies with domestic-only operations are sitting in the catbird seat. They don’t have to worry about tankers being targeted or pipelines being blown up halfway across the world.

Instead, they’re focused on drilling, producing, and cashing in on a price surge they had no hand in creating — but will fully benefit from.

Devon Energy is the reliable giant with a long track record. U.S. Energy Corp. is the small-cap sleeper with leverage to every price uptick. And Prairie Operating is the growth rocket, ready to capitalize on a perfect storm of rising production and surging oil prices.

If you’re looking for a way to profit from global instability without global risk, these are the names to watch.

Want the Full Picture?

If you’re serious about understanding how America’s domestic oil producers are seizing the moment — and which company is the best-positioned to surge in the coming months — don’t miss our free, in-depth research report on U.S. energy dominance.

Inside, you’ll discover:

The #1 American oil stock set to spike
Why American energy is poised to dominate the global markets
And how smart investors are using this window to build real wealth

It’s free, it’s actionable, and it’s yours for the asking.

👉 Get the report today and start positioning yourself before the next big move.

The stock market did something amazing in 2024.

Something it hadn’t done in a quarter century…

No kidding.

The market, as measured by the S&P 500 put in back-to-back 20% or higher gains.

In 2023 the S&P 500 closed up 24%. Last year it added another 23%.

Want to be even more impressed?

Since the index was founded in 1957, it has only accomplished this incredible feat of strength six times. That’s around once a decade on average.

So what does that portend for the coming year?

Let’s look at a couple influencing factors.

That Last Time…

The last time investors were popping the bubbly over back-to-back gains like this was in good old 1999.

We suspect every investor over 40 remembers what happened after that…

The turn of the millennium brought with it the bursting of the internet bubble and ushered in the era of what’s fondly become known as the “tech wreck” — the kickoff of a decade-long bear market.

Now to be fair, the initial bear leg bottomed after only two years and a 47% washout. And while the ensuing rally attempt got off to a great start gaining 26%, the next four years put in more modest gains ranging from 3% to 14%.

The building optimism, however, was short-lived when the market was clubbed like a baby seal in 2007 by yet another exploding bubble — the housing/mortgage bubble and the disaster known as the Great Financial Crisis — which cost the market 37%.

All in all, the years between 2000 and 2009 were nothing to write home about. From the final high to the final low, the index lost nearly 50% of its value.

And it all came on the heels of back-to-back 20%-plus gains.

Is it time to get nervous?

Sons of the Tech Bubble

When we look back at those dismal years, it’s important to note that four of those six 20%-plus performances were all put in between 1995 and 1999. THAT… is unprecedented.

Of course the tech bubble was the era of the new investing paradigm. When insane valuations didn’t matter anymore because it was all about the internet — and that was going to change everything.

Of course it didn’t.

Hundreds of stocks trading at thousands times earnings will never be profitable. Ever. The pretenders were dispatched in short order.

And in a potentially great irony, today’s multi-year performance might actually be considered an offshoot of that bubble. Because it’s being driven by a select number of mega-tech companies that survived the bust and grew up out of the boom.

You know them today as the “Mag 7” — multi-trillion dollar market cap monsters. (With Tesla and Meta playing catch-up.)

These “big dogs” have fully been the driving forces behind both years’ successes.

They’ve been such forces they’ve been able to push the market higher even in the face of the Fed’s manic rate hike cycle.

They’re able to do this because they’ve got so much cash in their war chests, they don’t give a hooey about higher rates. Case in point, Microsoft has already indicated they plan to spend a cool $80 billion on data center expansion in 2025. That’s a 44% increase from last year.

And that’s not all. According to Morgan Stanley Amazon could spend $96.4 billion… Google could spend $62.6 billion… and Meta could spend $52.3 billion.

Fed looking to dial back rate cuts in 2025? They don’t seem to care.

And why not?

Because they’re all jockeying for position in what might well become the next great bubble…

AI.

Investments in the nascent technology have been pretty rampant, and with good reason:

The industry is still in its infancy, but Wall Street’s forecasts suggest AI could add anywhere between $7 trillion and $200 trillion to the global economy during the next decade.

Those are big numbers.

But they’re also forecasts (best guesses).

And in chasing their share of the pie, the valuations of these companies driving these supers-sized gains are starting to become a little rich.

The 2024 PE for the Mag 7 came in around 40 vs 27 for the entire index. Forward PEs see valuations coming off a bit to 32.3 and 23.2 respectively.

Now, these rising PEs aren’t exactly 1990s tech bubble rich, but rich nonetheless. And the extensive capital expenditures will have the effect of eating into future margins. As reported in Reuters…

“I think what investors are missing is that for every year Microsoft overinvests – like they have this year – they’re creating a whole percentage point of drag on margins for the next six years,” said Gil Luria, head of technology research at D.A. Davidson.

Typically investors don’t see a bubble until it’s in their rearview mirror. And what would one look like in this case anyway? A move to more reasonable valuations within the Mag 7 would likely make for a year (or more) of struggles in the broader market.

On the other hand, if the index can complete the 20% trifecta this year that means S&P 500 levels around 7050.

Stay tuned…

They were NEVER buying it!

The year 2024AD was supposed to be the year of rate cuts. Until the fly of sticky inflation early on flew into that ointment.

By September, the Fed figured it couldn’t wait any longer and got down to business. They assured everyone that…

Our patient approach over the past year has paid dividends: Inflation is now much closer to our objective, and we have gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent.

Then they tried playing catch up by cutting rates 50 basis points.

With that they embarked on their quest for their next holy grail — “neutral.” According to the Fed, “neutral” a theoretical interest rate level that neither slows the economy nor lets it overheat. Like we said, it’s the holy grail.

It’s also a level they admit they don’t have a clue about.

No matter. They’re paid to do this kind of thing.

They’ve insisted they need to do this because their focus has shifted to the employment side of their mandate. According to Chair Powell…

As inflation has declined and the labor market has cooled, the upside risks to inflation have diminished, and the downside risks to employment have increased. We now see the risks to achieving our employment and inflation goals as roughly in balance, and we are attentive to the risks to both sides of our dual mandate.

Translation: “Don’t worry. We got inflation. Now we have to do employment. After all, we can’t be pushing the economy into a recession…”

The Reality Behind the Search for “Neutral”

This, of course, is all “narrative” — that is to say mostly BS. Inflation is still sticky by any number of measures. The real reason they need to lower rates is because levels above 5% are literally killing the Treasury.

In 2024, the US Treasury rolled over roughly $8 trillion of debt. And not just any debt. It was roughly 2% debt that was being refinanced into nearly 4% debt (assuming maturities stayed relatively the same). You don’t need to be a math genius to realize this is a lousy trade where debt goes.

But always the crafty one, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen forged a workaround by rolling more than 84% of it (old debt plus new financing) into short-term bills — securities maturing in 6 months or less.

Basically she was willing to pay up for a few months until Powell and company came up with a story to get rates lowered. The plan is not faring so well.

Because this year (2025) about another $3 trillion in debt will be coming due… Along with a bunch of debt rolled into short term paper last year.

Putting this in simple terms… The Treasury has another boatload of borrowing to do this year.

In any case, the Fed had been spinning their story of conquered inflation and bringing rates down to neutral levels and feeding it to the media. Who in turn have been dutifully parroting it in all their reporting.

But… there has been one huge disbeliever in the whole bunch…

The Bond Market

Back in September, when the Fed was insisting that they had it all under control and rates (including yields on Treasury debt) could safely come down — the bond market effectively flipped them the bird.

You can’t make this up… The very day the Fed commenced cutting, bond yields in the 10-year (the benchmark lending instrument) bottomed and started their trek higher.

The other factor is the massive amount of debt that will eventually be hitting the market this coming year. Supply and demand are still a thing.

Lately the Fed has been trying to walk back rate cut expectations for 2025. It seems they’ve come to grips with the reality that maybe it’s not quite time to go out in search of “neutral.”

The bond market never bought it in the first place.

While financial gurus like to sound like they have some special insight into the market, no one has a crystal ball.

We’ll be the first to admit it.

Investing is about doing your due diligence.

Of course there are tools that can give a savvy investor some inside clues about the market.

It’s a little known technical indicator that measures an important statistic known as “market breadth” called the Advance/Decline Line.

It’s a tool that actually can give you a glimpse at the internal strength or weakness of any market. And best of all, it’s super-simple to use…

A Look “Inside” the Market

Market “breadth” shows the relative participation in a market move by measuring the number of shares that are moving higher versus the number moving lower — in other words whether a rally is broadly-based or being driven by a few big stocks.

The math on this is ridiculously simple.

You just take the number of shares going up (usually over a trading session) and subtract the number of shares that went down. Then add that number to the previous day’s number.

Voila! Instant market insight.

The A/D line (as it’s known) can be a leading indicator by showing a deterioration in market strength if it starts to lag as prices are making new highs. It can also show accumulating strength in a bear trend by holding previous lows while prices are still heading lower.

Now that you understand the principles behind this indicator, let’s take a look at the A/D lines for four major indexes…

Four Indexes — Four A/D Lines

Let’s start with the big dog…

S&P 500

Look at the A/D line in the first circle compared with the price action. Market breadth appeared to be weakening as the A/D line couldn’t reach a new high with the market. It eventually did post a new high, but then fell off sharply as the market stalled.

Right now the indicator appears to be relatively in line with the price action of the market. But continued weakness into the new year could mean more internal weakness.

Dow Industrials Average

The Dow Industrials is only a 30 stock index, but it also contains $12.5 trillion in market cap with Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon. So it’s got some pretty mega-tech companies to drive it.

You can see the upward price bias throughout November, while the A/D line stayed basically flat. Year end profit taking pulled prices a bit back in line. But absent a confirmation by the indicator, new highs in the market should be viewed cautiously.

NASDAQ Composite

If you want a look at a troubling chart, look no further than the Nasdaq Composite. The Nasdaq is a capitalization-weighted index of 2,500 companies that lean heavily toward the tech sector.

The index was up over 30% in 2024 while its A/D line had been heading significantly lower for most of the year.

The price action is closer to what we’ve seen in the S&P 500 (another market-cap weighted index) but given the index contains 5-times as many stocks, this divergence between price and AD line drives home the fact that the rally is still in the hands of a handful of mega-tech companies.

Russell 2000

The Russell 2000 is an index of small cap companies.

Small caps have been struggling. While the S&P 500 gained over 24% last year, the Russell Index managed less than half that rallying 10.8%. Here you can clearly see the divergence between the A/D line and the price action of the index. New price highs were made, but market breadth didn’t support it.

The pullback has brought prices back into line somewhat, but the fact that the A/D line has moved so far below previous lows may be indicating the market is still under some stress.

As Always: One Caveat…

To be sure, this indicator is not the “holy grail” of investing. There are no sure things.

When it comes to the markets, “only price pays” — no matter what your indicators may be telling you, price is the only indicator that really matters!

Everything in your technical arsenal could be screaming “sell, sell, sell,” but if the market keeps going higher… It’s going higher. (Have another look at the Nasdaq Composite chart!)

It’s no secret that for the past two-plus years, it’s been basically a handful of stocks — the AI/mega-tech sector — that has been pulling the market higher. And they’ll continue to be an influence.

But all that said, technical indicators like the advance/decline line can offer important insights into what may be building internally in the market.

And that’s always important for a smart investor to know.

Every year as we get around to pinning a new calendar to the wall, financial writers start focusing on two topics… the big events from the year gone by and the big opportunities for the coming one.

Many sites will make calls on certain stocks based on things like developing trends, companies’ past performance, and just enough analysis to justify their logic.

(In all cases, we recommend that you always do your due diligence before investing in any opportunity, to make sure it fits in your investment goals and risk profile.)

We don’t do that. But…

If you are interested in a small group of stocks that has the potential to outperform one of the major market indexes, there’s a strategy we’d like to introduce you to…

The “Dogs” of the Dow

What’s that?

The “Dogs” concept was popularized in 1991. It’s an investing strategy that looks to outperform the Dow Industrials by buying the 10 stocks in the index with the highest dividend yields.

Why would this be a good idea?

A company’s dividend yield is its annual dividend divided by the share price of the stock. Let’s say Company X pays a $2.50 annual dividend and is currently trading for $27. That means it has a 9.2% dividend yield.

However, if Company X is trading for $19, its dividend yield would be over 13%.

So a higher dividend yield generally indicates a lower stock price.

Remember, the Dow Industrials is an average of 30 of the bluest of the blue chip companies in the market. All solid, well-capitalized companies. Not a high-risk name in the bunch.

So when one of these stocks’ dividend yield rises, it usually means its price has come under some cyclical or temporary pressure. Which should make them poised to outperform the market as their share prices recover.

How does it work?

The Dogs of the Dow is basically a “set it and forget it” strategy. You buy the Dogs in January, hold them through the year, and then adjust your holdings for the following year.

Simple.

But how does it perform?

You might be surprised.

A Pretty Impressive Record

In an era of Nvidia-like return expectations, a lot of investors think of dividend paying stocks as “stodgy” companies that can’t keep up the growth pace with the rest of the market. But these “Dogs” have done pretty well relative to the DJIA index.

Between 2007 and 2009, the Dogs portfolio was beaten by the Dow, but…

In 2010 it was Dogs up 16% – Dow plus 9%…

In 2011 the Dogs beat the Dow by 11 percentage points…

In 2012 it was a dead heat with both rising roughly 10%…

In 2013 it was the Dogs again closing up 35% vs the Dow’s 30%…

In 2014 it was a closer contest with the Dogs up 11% and the Dow up 10%…

In 2015 the Dogs gained 3% while the Dow was flat…

In 2016 it was Dogs up 20% and the Dow up 17%…

In 2017 the Dogs took it on the chin gaining 19% vs. the Dow’s 25% rise…

In 2018 the Dogs fell 1.5% while the Dow dropped 6%…

In 2019 the Dogs managed a 15.4% gain while the Dow posted a 22.3% rise…

In 2020 the Dogs got clobbered losing 12.6% while the Dow gained 7.2%…

In 2021 the Dogs got some revenge rallying 25.3% compared to 21% for the Dow…

In 2022 it was Dogs plus 2.2% – Dow minus 8.8%…

And in 2023 the Dogs got edged gaining 10.1% vs the Dow’s 14.4% move.

Overall, according to Nasdaq, “From 2000 to 2022, the Dogs of the Dow had an average annual return of 8.7% compared to 5.8% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA).”

What about last year?

In 2024 the Dogs were, well… dogs. The portfolio lost 2.97% while the Dow as a whole was up 12.8%.

Their performance lagged in large part on the backs of healthcare/pharmaceutical stocks. Amgen was down 9.5% and Johnson & Johnson fell 7.7%. But the biggest loser in the bunch was Walgreens which took a huge 64.3% hit thanks to a combination of bad business decisions and industry pricing pressures.

Chemical conglomerate Dow Inc. also took a dive dropping 26.8%.

The only two tech stocks, IBM and Cisco gained 34.4% and 17.2% respectively.

One of the chief criticisms of the strategy is that it may overweight an investor in one particular sector. That appears to have been a factor.

But it’s also worth noting that the Dogs have a tendency to bounce back. If you look at the returns above, the Dogs portfolio got its butt kicked in 2020 only to rebound to outperform in 2021. (And Walgreens got dropped from the index.)

So are the Dogs of the Dow right for you?

Only you can determine that by doing your due diligence.

But if you are interested in looking into this unique portfolio, here are the Dogs for 2025…

Verizon (VZ) — 6.78%

Chevron (CVX) — 4.50%

Amgen (AMGN) — 3.65%

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) — 3.43%

Merck (MRK) — 3.26%

Coca-Cola (KO) — 3.12%

IBM (IBM) — 3.04%

Cisco Systems (CSCO) — 2.70%

McDonalds (MCD) — 2.44%

Procter & Gamble (PG) — 2.40%

The FOMC is closed out 2024 this week.

While humbly bragging that inflation is well under control, they’ve set off in search of more “neutral” interest rate levels to ward off any slowdown in the economy.

Most media will tell you that they have spectacularly engineered the elusive “soft landing.” And that you don’t realize how good you’ve got it!

Others would beg to disagree..

They’ll point out Donald Trump won the White House in pretty amazing fashion based on the fact that Bidenomics and the economy it created both sucked.

Each camp comes to their conclusion based on the measuring stick they use.

And there’s more than one way to measure an inflation monster…

Welcome to “Sticky-ville”

As if there weren’t enough ways to demonstrate how badly the economy is treating you, the Atlanta Fed itself has devised another. It’s called the Sticky-Price CPI.

What is that?

The Atlanta Fed started tinkering with this measure nearly ten years ago. The idea behind it is that some items in the CPI basket change very rapidly in response to economic factors (they’re known as “flexible”) while other items change much more slowly (they’re “sticky”).

The big question on everybody’s mind was whether either of these groups was a better predictor of different drivers of inflation. In other words, was either one a better forecast tool.

After examining the data for a bit, they discovered that half of the categories change their prices every 4.3 months. So they used that as their cut off.

Items with prices that changed more frequently (like, say, tomatoes) were dubbed “flexible” while those that moved less frequently (like coin-operated laundries) fell into the “sticky” basket.

When you plot the two categories, they look pretty much like you’d expect:

But the trillion dollar question was still was either basket a better predictor?

To determine that, they dove into some high-level math. They used something called the root mean squared error (RSME) which is a statistical way to measure how accurate a prediction is.

They compared the RMSE of each basket to the RMSE of the forecast produced from the headline CPI at intervals of one month, three months, 12 months and 24 months out. (We’ll skip the boring math discussion.) What you need to know is that according to the Fed…

A relative RMSE less than 1.0 indicates that the alternative proxy for inflation expectations is more accurate than the headline CPI.

The results were undeniable.

The one month forecasts were all about equal. But, starting with three months out, the sticky and core sticky baskets proved to be better forecasters. And they became even better predictors the further out they went.

Forecasting Trouble

So what are they showing as the FOMC’s year came to a close?

The Atlanta Fed’s sticky-price consumer price index (CPI)—a weighted basket of items that change price relatively slowly—rose 2.4 percent (on an annualized basis) in November, following a 3.6 percent increase in October. On a year-over-year basis, the series is up 3.8 percent.

On a core basis (excluding food and energy), the sticky-price index rose 2.4 percent (annualized) in November, and its 12-month percent change was 3.9 percent.

The year-over-year numbers are double the Fed’s “mandate.”

While their “preferred” inflation gauge, the PCE index, is showing headline inflation around 2.3%, other measures like core CPI which hasn’t been below 3% since April 2021, suggest that things are still not under control.

And considering the Atlanta Fed’s sticky forecasting tool, it may not be for a while.

We suppose that on occasion it may seem like we’re obsessed with predicting Armageddon.

We cite sky-high stock valuations.

We talk about the fact that the strength in the market has largely been driven by a handful of mega-tech/AI stocks.

We point out economic realities (and the Fed interventions they prompt) that don’t support the case for a stampeding bull market.

Our only goal in offering these observations is to make you, our readers, aware of the realities attached to the stock market (and to a larger degree, the economy). It’s important to know these things because we believe that you don’t always get the unvarnished truth (occasionally not even the “varnished” truth) from the mainstream.

For example… A few months ago in August, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its 2024 preliminary benchmark revision.

Each year, the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey employment estimates are benchmarked to comprehensive counts of employment for the month of March. These counts are derived from state unemployment insurance (UI) tax records that nearly all employers are required to file. For National CES employment series, the annual benchmark revisions over the last 10 years have averaged plus or minus one-tenth of one percent of total nonfarm employment. The preliminary estimate of the benchmark revision indicates an adjustment to March 2024 total nonfarm employment of -818,000 (-0.5 percent).

In plain English, once a year the BLS adjusts its jobs totals against state unemployment tax records (a more accurate number than their monthly guess). This past March the 12-month jobs number had to be revised down 818,000 jobs. That’s five times the average of the last 10 years.

Things aren’t as rosy as they’ve been letting on.

In the reality of our financialized economy, this is business as usual. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be aware of it.

So we point out the bad stuff. To make sure you have all the facts at your disposal.

But that doesn’t mean we’re looking forward to the doom and gloom. The bigger reality is…

Stocks are a Bullish Phenomenon

The primary direction of the stock market is up!

In fact 80% of the time the market is in a bull trend.

It’s always the corrections (“calamities”) that get the news coverage. But stocks, as a whole, have always come back. Let’s go back 40 years for an example…

In October 1987 the market experienced one of the most spectacular crashes in modern times. After putting in a rebound high on October 2, the market gave up roughly 35% of its value in just 12 days. (Actually, the majority of the crash came in only five days!)

S&P 500 – The October ‘87 Crash

It shook investors’ confidence for months. It led President Reagan to establish a group called the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets (known colloquially as the “Plunge Protection Team”).

But once the shock had worn off, the market started to rebound. And within two years, it had eclipsed its previous all-time high in 1987. (Meaning that those who were buyers during the bottoming period made somewhere around 50% on their money.)

Some declines (and subsequent rebounds) take longer than others.

The tech wreck of 2000 — sparked by the “new paradigm” of paying multiples for companies with zero earnings — took the better part of two years to find its bottom.

But it eventually did.

Today the S&P 500 is 1,700% higher than its high in 1987…

It’s 290% higher than its high in 2000…

It’s even 79% higher than its high in 2020…

Patience is the Thing

There’s a saying about the market that goes, “It’s better to be out when you want to be in, than to be in when you want to be out…”

Bear markets, especially those that happen in a hurry (i.e. crashes), can take their toll on investors’ nerves.

And there’s always the question of how long before it resumes its upward path. (And relative to an investor’s cost basis (the price where you’re in the market) that can try an investor’s patience as well.)

But given time, the market always rises.

Legendary NYSE commentator Art Cashin once said…

“Never bet on the end of the world because that only happens once and something that happens once in infinity is a long shot.”

Our goal is to give you all the unvarnished info out there.

But we’re not betting on the end of the world.

Here’s to a great 2025!

“All the Whos down in Whoville liked Christmas a lot.

But the Grinch, who lived just north of Whoville, did not!”

– Dr. Seuss

The annual holiday classic, that we’ve all seen a million times, tells the story of a nasty green cave dweller who tries to stop Christmas.

Despite the fact he eventually learns the true meaning of Christmas and saves the day, his name has become synonymous with being cynical or mean-spirited.

Well, since the holiday season is at hand, we want to say up front that we really don’t mean to be a Grinch about the markets.

But given we feel it’s our duty to show our readers the unvarnished investing truth, here’s a development you need to know…

Recalling the “Value Master”

A couple weeks back, we took note of the fact that none other than Warren Buffett — mister buy and die — had become a net seller in the stock market.

Buffett, who still actively manages Berkshires’ portfolio, has been a net seller of stocks for the past eight quarters, significantly rearranging his portfolio. …

Add it all up and Buffett has raised Berkshire’s cash position to $320 billion versus just $272 billion in stocks.

We speculated on the reasons for this notable shift in sentiment:

Is the Oracle calling a top? It’s certainly not impossible. Buffett is the king of buying value — great companies fairly priced. If valuations are exceeding what he deems reasonable, he may be building a cash store to take advantage of a major correction.

We also noted that Buffett is not a market timer. So the fact that he’s unloading now doesn’t suggest that anything is imminent. Better to be out when you want to be in instead of in when you want to be out.

But given our speculation, we found a recent analysis of the market’s overall valuation to be worth noting. But first…

A Little Primer On Valuation

When you buy a stock, you’re basically buying a piece of the company’s expected future earnings. And the price you pay today should reflect a discounted value of that. So in basic terms, price should be a fair reflection of value. But that’s not always the case.

Comparing the price of a company’s stock to its earnings (price-earnings or P/E ratio) is the most common way of establishing valuation. Below is an historical chart of the P/E ratio of the S&P 500:

You can see that for over 100 years, valuations basically oscillated around the long-term mean with a dip 50% below indicating undervalued and rise to 50% above indicating overvalued. Then, however, came the tech bubble and valuations became both extreme and extremely volatile.

Another, more smoothed measure, is known as the cyclically-adjusted price-earnings (CAPE) ratio. (It’s also known as the Shiller PE Ratio for the economist Robert Shiller who invented it.) This ratio measures price to earnings except instead of using a single year of earnings, it uses average real earnings over a 10-year period. This smooths out volatility as a result of business cycles.

You can see this measure smoothed things out considerably leaving only two overvaluation spikes: before the crash of 1929 and the bust that followed the tech bubble… until today.

Today valuations according to the Shiller ratio are at their second highest levels in history.

But there’s yet one more level of smoothing that can be done…

It comes from Damien Cleusix of QuantasticWorld and it’s called the margin-adjusted, cyclically-adjusted price-earning ratio (MAPE).

MAPE factors in and adjusts for the level of profit margins embedded in the valuation calculation.
And by this measure the market isn’t just overvalued… It’s insanely overvalued. According to Cleusix “the US stock market is the most overvalued it has ever been.”

Looking at this chart, the sky-high valuations (the level traced in green) are obvious. Further, if you construct a band with boundaries between the 0 and 50 percentiles of historical MAPE, this is what you get:

According to Cleusix:

The S&P 500 is currently almost 400% above the level corresponding to a bottom MAPE and 130% above the 50% percentile MAPE history.

Valuations at the high end of any measure suggest that an investment is “priced for perfection” — that earnings and growth will continue ad infinitum. And that leaves the door open for any kind of disappointment to send prices plummeting back to more “reasonable” valuations.

Like we said, we don’t want to be Grinchy this close to the holidays. But being aware of the potential threats to the market (and the bad news that could result) is the key to actually having a merrier Christmas!

The Fed has officially embarked on its quest for the holy grail of monetary policy…

Having slain the inflation monster with restrictive rates of 5.5% (or so they say) they must now start easing off the brakes so the rest of the economy doesn’t sputter and die.

The problem is, as Chairman Powell has admitted over and over, they have no idea what “neutral” actually is. (But they assure us, they’ll know it when they see it.)

And despite not knowing where they’re headed, they launched their effort by slashing their target rate by 50 basis points. Pretty much as large as they could go without sparking some panic in the market.

The market, which had been in a solid uptrend since the low in October 2022, driven largely by mega-cap AI stocks, celebrated by continuing its rally.

This policy reversal by the Fed is something the market has been anticipating for some time. And now that the easing cycle is underway, it should continue to please those big players driving the market.

But it should also benefit another segment of the market that has been lagging. And that creates an opportunity for investors…

Rise of the Small Caps

Since the low in October 2022, small cap companies have lagged the bigger players in the market. Take a look at the chart below…

S&P 500 vs Russell 2000

You can see tightly related performance of both the S&P 500 (an index dominated by mega-cap companies) and the Russell 2000 (an index of small-cap companies) into the 2022 low.

Once mega-AI stocks began to drive the rally, the bigger better capitalized stocks took off. Smaller cap stocks, on the other hand, struggled to keep up lagging by over 20%.

That’s one sector that had been significantly impacted by the Fed’s tightening cycle. Now that’s very likely to change.

Why Small-Caps Love Lower Rates

Small cap companies are typically more sensitive to interest rates. One reason is that they tend to be more reliant on external financing to fund their operations and growth.

Huge companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft all have massive cash reserves they can fall back on to fund their strategic plans. Tens of billions have been spent by big tech from their war chests on AI development.

But many smaller companies, companies with market caps in the lower billion dollar range, don’t have that kind of financial ammo. They have to keep their eyes on operations. That means strategic borrowing is much more critical when it comes to things like financing growth and innovation.

Another reason is bottom line profitability.

Smaller-cap companies generally have smaller profit margins than their bigger capitalized cousins. And a higher cost of capital (what they pay to borrow) tends to take a significant bite out of their already-thin bottom line.

With the Fed moving to ease, lower financing costs will ultimately boost many small-cap companies’ bottom lines making them more profitable companies.

And of course, that leads to a third factor in bolstering the fortunes of the small-cap crowd — more profitable companies are more attractive to investors.

Lower interest rates, from an investor perspective, tends to generate what’s known as a “risk on” investment environment. One where funds and other institutional investors will leverage their portfolios by borrowing money to invest in companies they feel have potential for significant returns.

And companies that have the potential for significant returns? Well they’re generally the ones that are undervalued or have been lagging the broader market.

Right now, that’s the small cap sector.

Looking at the chart above, the small-cap sector as a whole has significant room to actually outperform larger-cap competitors.

Some small caps will do better than others. But right now may be the time for savvy investors to start scanning the small-cap universe for significant opportunities.