fbpx

They’ll never say it out loud, but the position of Treasury Secretary is basically your mom. 

The high-profile, cabinet-level position is basically in charge of paying the bills, collecting the income and managing the finances — pretty much like your mom did way back when.

Unlike your mom, the Treasury Secretary is also in charge of overseeing national banks, printing currency (not like the Fed, but actually printing and minting bills and coins), enforcing financial laws and prosecuting financial criminals and tax evaders. 

These are all important jobs. But one of the most important that your mom also doesn’t get to do is weigh in on fiscal policies. Fiscal policy refers to how the government spends its money. 

As the government doesn’t actually “create” value, it doesn’t really “earn” money. So for the record, fiscal policy is how the government spends other peoples’ money. 

To obtain this money, the Treasury Department levies taxes on its citizens. And what that money can’t cover, they borrow.

Since the turn of the millennium, there have been eight people from both sides of the aisle to hold the office. During that same time, the national debt has increased by 523%.  

Thanks to this irresponsibility two major credit rating companies downgraded the US’ credit rating under the terms of Timothy Geithner in 2011 and Janet Yellen in 2023.

(That is terrible fiscal planning that threatens our economy overall.)

So when a new Treasury Secretary is nominated, markets generally have a say…

The New Guy on the Hill

Recently, President-Elect Trump nominated Scott Bessett to take over the job in his administration.

FILE – Investor Scott Bessent speaks on the economy in Asheville, N.C., Aug. 14, 2024.(Matt Kelley | (AP Photo/Matt Kelley, File))

The following Monday, the Dow Industrials erupted, soaring as much as 519 points on the news. 

It would seem the market approved. Bessent does represent a change from the current Treasury administration.

Janet Yellen has been a lifelong academic and a career bureaucrat. 

Bessent on the other hand, has a background in the market. The letters behind his Yale degree only reach to BA (but he was a member of the Wolf’s Head Society — one of Yale’s  three “secret” societies — so that’s gotta count for something). 

He basically made his bones in the market working for Soros Fund Management (yes, that Soros) where he was on board during the Black Wednesday crisis where his boss crushed the British Pound. 

He left Soros in 2000 to start his own hedge fund which shut down in 2005. He returned to Soros where he stayed until 2015 when he went off to start another fund, the Key Square Group.  

While some may wonder about his Soros-related pedigree, he is a guy with in-the-trenches experience in financial markets. 

A Deeper Look

Bessent is a “macro” investor — a strategist who considers macroeconomic and geopolitical factors — which gives him a real-world perspective on what works and what doesn’t where the economy goes.

Among his stances around the incoming president, he’s promised to take action on Trump’s tax cut plans. Including “making his first-term cuts permanent, and eliminating taxes on tips, social-security benefits and overtime pay.”

He’s been a vocal critic of the US’ debt load which the bond market should find interesting. In a plan to help get the debt under control he’s promoted the ideas of reducing government spending. And freezing non-defense discretionary spending.

This will be an important focus as Congress will have to re-implement the debt ceiling it suspended in 2023.

He’s also proposed an economic policy he calls “3-3-3.” According to the Wall Street Journal:

Bessent’s “three arrows” include cutting the budget deficit to 3% of gross domestic product by 2028, spurring GDP growth of 3% through deregulation and producing an additional 3 million barrels of oil or its equivalent a day.

But most notable is his stance on Trump’s tariff policies. 

Tariffs have been the most controversial aspects of Trump’s economic plan. Opponents have called it mercantilist and protectionist promising higher costs for consumers. 

Bessent backs Trump’s ideas on tariffs, just not all at once. Taking a more gradual approach, “Bessent said he favors that they be “layered in” so as not to cause anything more than short-term adjustments.”

Bessent called for tariffs to resemble the Treasury Department’s sanctions program as a tool to promote U.S. interests abroad. He was open to removing tariffs from countries that undertake structural overhauls and voiced support for a fair-trade block for allies with common security interests and reciprocal approaches to tariffs.

Seeing Bessent as a backer and a balance for the incoming POTUS, the market has approved of the choice thus far.

Nevermind that so many retailers have their Christmas decorations out and for sale sometime around Halloween (or even earlier!)

Things don’t start heating up until the day after Thanksgiving.

The day that has infamously become known as “Black Friday.”

The shopping version of the day started back in the 80s. In theory it’s the day retailers went from “in the red” to profitably “in the black.” And to kick off the holiday shopping season, they offered some of the most irresistible deals ever. 

Sometimes opening in the middle of the night, retailers would open their doors to “hordes” (and we do not use that word hyperbolically) of bargain hunters stampeding in to get their hands on one of the limited number of big screen TVs, or computers, or gaming consoles…

It made for some riveting images over the years…

Source: Getty Images

With the ascendency of Amazon, online shopping began to steal some of Black Friday’s thunder and Cyber Monday was born. 

The span between the two days has become a critical barometer for how the larger shopping season will go. And ultimately how retailers will perform during what’s become a really critical season for profits.

This year may be even more telling.

Predictions of a Booming Season

Management consultancy Bain & Company has prepared some predictions for this year’s holiday shopping extravaganza. First the good news…

Retailers can expect another doorbuster Black Friday–to–Cyber Monday shopping period. Bain forecasts US retail sales will reach $75 billion for the first time ever, growing by about 5% year over year and outpacing our total holiday season forecast of 3%. What’s more, around 8% of Bain-defined holiday sales will come between Black Friday and Cyber Monday this year—the highest share since 2019. This underscores the enduring importance of this key shopping weekend.

Further, they anticipate that 8% of all holiday sales will be made during that weekend. 

A big kickoff to the shopping season is a key signal for retailers. Over the past three years, Black Friday has ranked either first or second in terms of sales made over the period. (Over the past two years, Cyber Monday has dropped out of the top-7 sales rankings.) 

A softer start to the season would not bode well for retailers and increase pressure to boost sales during the 2-3 days before Christmas — another popular shopping window. 

Still the initial outlook is bright.

Something Else to Watch…

We hate to be a total Grinch during this festive season, but the actual consumer is something else we need to watch. Simply because they’re spending in record amounts, shouldn’t be interpreted as a booming consumer sector.

Financial website NerdWallet recently published its holiday spending report. Right in line with the Bain report, their feedback has been positive.

The holiday season is nearly here and with it, ample opportunity to spend big. According to a new NerdWallet analysis, Americans plan to spend about $17 billion more on gifts and about $46 billion more on flights and hotels this holiday season than they did last year.

Unfortunately, what this survey doesn’t tell us is whether shoppers plan to buy more things or just anticipate paying higher prices. Or some combination of both. Still, more money spent is generally good for the retail sector. 

One thing the study does indicate is how consumers are paying for all their holiday joy.

Most shoppers plan to use credit cards again for this year’s holiday shopping: Nearly three-quarters of 2024 holiday shoppers (74%) say they’ll put at least some of their holiday gift purchases on a credit card.

More and more shoppers are relying on credit to make purchases.

And while some shoppers use their plastic to earn some type of reward, suggested by the number of shoppers who quickly pay off their balances…

Of Americans who put 2023 holiday gift purchases on a credit card, less than a third (31%) paid it off with the first statement.

…Others use them out of necessity evidenced by lingering balances:

The survey found that nearly 3 in 10 Americans who used credit cards to pay for holiday gifts last year (28%) still haven’t paid off their balances. Likewise, the same proportion (28%) of 2023 holiday travelers who put flights and hotel stays on a credit card still haven’t paid off the balances.

We’ve been writing about the struggles of the average consumer and how it’s been showing up in the retail sector. Certain retailers (Walmart, Costco…) are booming while others (Target, Kohls, and most dollar stores…) have been getting the cold shoulder from consumers. 

Retailer’s earnings fate in the coming quarter will depend largely on how holiday sales go.

The economy, on the other hand, is far more dependent on the fate of the consumer…

Is he a modern-day Leonardo da Vinci?

Or just a master grifter?

Everyone has an opinion about Elon Musk.

But whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that opportunity always seems to follow wherever he goes.

Musk has been at the helm of Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) for nearly 20 years. And in that time, amid unkept promises and years-late deliveries, he’s still managed to grow Tesla into the most valuable car manufacturer in the world — in most cases by a factor of 10!

And not simply because of the cars it makes. But because of the technological opportunities that the company (and Musk) creates.

Tesla makes cars. But it’s also a software company. It’s a robotics company. It’s a battery company.

And no matter how fast traditional car makers try to play catch up, they’re still a long way off from what Musk is serving up. (None have generated any significant profit from the EV segments.)

And now, his sudden “bromance” with President-elect Trump has once again put Musk and Tesla in the spotlight.

Trump has gone on record saying he’s not a fan of the Biden administration’s “EV mandate.” But, notably, his tone has softened since the “First Buddy” helped deliver a decisive electoral victory in November.

The market seems to understand this because since Musk endorsed Trump, Tesla’s share price has rallied substantially.

There looks to be a great deal of opportunity coming on the heels of this “merger.”

But there are other strategic ways to capitalize on the Trump/Musk trend besides Tesla…

Playing the Tesla Wave Strategy #1: Large Cap

While Tesla is the 800-pound gorilla of the EV manufacturing world, one US player is starting to play some serious catch-up.

Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN) is an exclusive EV manufacturer with a market cap of just over $11 billion.

The company struggled out of the gate like any other EV company has, but today they’re making great strides in growing their business overcoming production delays and delivering vehicles on a regular schedule.

Currently they only produce two models of vehicles: the R1T and R1S.

And in doing that, they’ve actually done one strategically smart thing…  They opted to specialize in producing the most popular vehicle type in the US, trucks and SUVs.

Trucks and SUVs continue to be the most popular type of vehicle in the United States. Sales of trucks and SUVs were up 17.2% in August 2023 from August 2022.

This carves out a niche for them to become top competitors to Tesla’s Cybertruck.

To make their vehicles even more attractive, they’ve made their chargers compatible with Tesla’s Superchargers giving their users more options for charging when on the road.

Additionally, they’ve partnered with Amazon to deliver 100,000 electric vans by 2030 giving them a solid demand base for the coming years.

Most recently, In November 2024, the Biden administration announced a conditional commitment for a $6.6 billion loan to Rivian Automotive to support the construction of a new electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing facility in Georgia.

The planned facility, known as Project Horizon, is expected to produce up to 400,000 vehicles annually and create approximately 7,500 jobs by 2030. Rivian intends to manufacture its more affordable R2 and R3 models at this plant, targeting a broader consumer market.

Their price action has tracked Tesla’s over the past year but has lagged since “Trump/Musk” rally. Now may be their opportunity to catch up.

Rivian v. Tesla

Source: Barchart

Playing the Tesla Wave Strategy #2: Mid Cap

While Tesla typically makes people think of car manufacturers, battery technology remains the heart and soul of the EV revolution.

Enter EnerSys (NYSE: ENS), a mid-cap company specializing in energy storage solutions. Known for its innovative battery systems, it’s a critical supplier for both the EV and renewable energy sectors.

As of December 2024, EnerSys boasts a market capitalization of $3.83 billion, with its stock trading at $96.66 per share. Its steady growth and diverse product portfolio make it an ideal choice for investors seeking stability with upside potential in the rapidly expanding EV battery market.

What’s more, according to a Yahoo Finance Fair Value analysis, the company is currently significantly undervalued, with a potential 32% upside according to the web site’s analysts.

Source: Yahoo

Playing the Tesla Wave Strategy #3: Small Cap

Rivian and EnerSys are both solid, well-capitalized players in the traditional EV world.

But for investors with a bit more risk appetite, you’ll want to look at smaller-cap companies looking to add a disruptive aspect to the rapidly growing sector — a company looking to bring something entirely “new” to the game.

These are the companies that offer the potentially biggest bang for your investment buck.

And if that’s what you’re looking for, Nuvve Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: NVVE) is well worth considering.

Nuvve’s breakthrough technology is called Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology.

V2G is a smart charging technology that effectively allows EV batteries to resell stored unused power back to the grid — effectively making any EV owner a power provider. This innovative “personal grid” technology could well revolutionize how power is managed and monetized.

And this kind of forward thinking couldn’t come at a better time. Given the exponential demands for electricity that the AI megatrend is placing on grid and grid infrastructure, this kind of technology could be rapidly viewed as a major solution to the problem, and one that could be implemented right now without significantly overhauling the existing grid infrastructure.

Currently, Nuvve has a market capitalization of just $3.19 million. But despite its small size, the company has been making strategic moves to position itself as a major player in the nascent but rapifly growing V2G market.

While small-cap stocks carry inherent risks, Nuvve’s potential to tap into the multibillion-dollar V2G market gives it a growth trajectory that few other companies can match.

The Trump/Musk relationship has made a huge splash in the business and political industries …

… But it’s these three companies that could well be riding the wave higher.

Let’s cut to the chase…

This week on Investment Journal we’ve been contemplating the questionable state of the US consumer. And if their state really is questionable, that calls into question the future state of retail players throughout the economy. 

It’s no secret to anyone paying attention that retailers have been facing their share of struggles since the pandemic.

Over the course of 2024, and with the S&P 500 up just over 25% year-to-date, some have worked their way higher. For instance…

Home Depot is up nearly 21% while Kroeger is up 28%. The Gap, who struggled through some volatility, is up 16%. And Best Buy is up just over 15%.

Others, however, have struggled…

CVS and Walgreens are off 28% and a disappointing 67% respectively. Macy’s is down 17% and Kohls is off 39%. Target recently took it on the chin giving up all its annual gains, now trading some 13% lower. 

But then there are those who have outperformed like BJs Wholesale Club up 44% and Costco up a very solid 48%.

But none of these can touch Walmart — up a stellar 70% on the year. 

Walmart vs. S&P 500 (YTD)

Source: Barchart

So is WMT the NVDA of retail?

To Dominate in Retail…

Walmart’s surge comes on the heels of a series of positive earnings reports. Most notably was last week’s earnings:

• Earnings per share: 58 cents adjusted vs. 53 cents expected

• Revenue: $169.59 billion vs. $167.72 billion expected

But not only that, they upped their guidance for the year looking for sales to grow between 4.8% and 5.1% versus their previous forecast of between 3.75% and 4.75%.

We noted this week that a sizable portion of that growth (75% of the gain) was from households earning over $100K per year. Not what you’d consider to be a typical Walmart shopper.

Clearly Walmart has been a force in the discount retail sector for years. But why have they been so dominant, attracting a higher income cohort while others (like Target) can’t keep up?

We think it’s because they’re a superior company. And here’s what we mean…

Like most of the competition, early on in 2022 WMT was struggling to rebound from the disaster that was the pandemic shutdowns. Their stock dropped nearly 25%. But by the end of the year they started to rebound while the competition lagged. 

One of the main reasons?

Management! 

They were better able to manage inventory issues that had arisen out of the pandemic. They were able to cut their Inventory overhang by more than $500 million in just one quarter by strategically discounting prices. 

This faster path back to normal was in large part thanks to better management.

And that same savvy management has them over performing this year. 

The Nvidia of retail?

We’ll see…

It accounts for 70% of the country’s GDP.

Consumer spending. 

Makes sense. Healthy consumers are obviously necessary for a healthy economy. 

But good health isn’t always apparent on the surface. Trouble can be quietly developing under the surface.

Like the heart disease candidate whose arteries are filling with plaque. They may look perfectly fine… until they’re lying on the ground clutching their chest. 

Today’s economy is something like that.

Last October, the BEA announced that real GDP rose at an annualized rate of 2.8%.

That is an impressive number. 

To take it at face value (much like the Fed has been insisting we do) you’d have to say that the economy, and consumers in particular, are doing just fine. So have another piece of cheesecake.

The reality underlying the situation, however, isn’t so good.

A Shift in Buying Preference 

In a broadly healthy economy, a rising GDP should lift all boats. (Or most anyway.) You expect to see retailers posting great numbers across the board. Blood is pumping through those arteries. 

But that’s not what has been happening. And it hasn’t been happening for some time…

All the way back in November 2022, the Wall Street Journal reported:

Source: The Wall Street Journal

“Walmart gains more shoppers” sounds like good news. But article reported strains in the consumer sector:

The country’s largest retailer by revenue said Tuesday that households continue to face pressure from rising food prices, and lower-income shoppers are eating into savings.

Inflation was still roaring at the time and CPI for that month came in at 7.1%. And you’d expect that kind of news from lower-income shoppers. But what you might not expect…

During the most recent quarter, households earning $100,000 or more helped push Walmart grocery sales higher, executives said.

Sales data had indicated that higher-income consumers had begun to trade down searching for bargains. When inflation begins to reach the middle to upper income brackets, stress is beginning to build. 

Still, with prices soaring over 7% annually, it’d be reasonable to argue that most households would be looking to save a buck or two.

But now with inflation “well on track back to 2%,” if you believe the Fed, things should be shifting back to normal. But they’re not.

In fact, they’re going in the opposite direction…

The Trade Down Continues

This November Walmart released its earnings. Not only did they beat revenue and earnings estimates, they raised their forward guidance. 

In particular, management noted…

While average transaction growth slowed, customers are buying more at each visit, driving ticket sizes. A lot of that growth was driven by upper-income households making $100,000 a year or more as increasingly more affluent households trade down. That cohort made up roughly 75% of share gains for the quarter.

Two years later, the $100K and up cohort is still shopping at Walmart. And they’re doing it more and more. 

This suggests clear strains in the economy. In a recent webinar, Goldman Sachs noted:

Our focus on the webinar centers around discussing high-end and low-end consumers trading down. This phenomenon occurs as macroeconomic headwinds mount, including elevated inflation and high interest rates due to backfiring ‘Bidenomics.’ More importantly, trading down occurs when incomes don’t keep up with inflation or when purchasing power decreases.

So the trade down phenomenon itself is suggesting trouble. But there’s more…

The bargain hunting isn’t carrying across the board. 

Target, who released their earnings the same day as Walmart, missed everywhere with their stock dropping 21% on the news. 

This suggests that the trade down to discount stores isn’t even widespread. (Even Dollar General collapsed on its latest earnings report.)

The bottom line: The trade down and concentration of retail customers suggests they’re taking a seriously defensive position as economic conditions become more and more uncertain.

Could be tough times ahead. 

It’s official, the president-elect is going scorched earth.

A little over a week past the election, he’s put forth a string of cabinet picks that have, to say the least, raised a few eyebrows.

Senator Marco Rubio for Secretary of State. Marco’s a conservative “politician” who should have no trouble getting confirmed. 

Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense. A Fox reporter?!?! Turns out Hegseth is a decorated 20-year veteran who served in multiple forward areas. He’s also written extensively on the military. Guess you can’t judge a book by its cover.

Matt Gaetz for Attorney General. The head of the DOJ. Gaetz has been a hard core Trump loyalist from day one and has made his share of enemies on Capitol Hill. Watch the fireworks over this one!

And then there’s the department of Health and Human Services — HHS. 

Make America Healthy Again

The incoming 47th president just nominated none other than Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 

“He’s going to help make America healthy again. … He wants to do some things, and we’re going to let him get to it,” Trump said during his victory speech.”

RFK is a noted vaccine critic. We won’t debate the value of vaccines. By 1994, the polio vaccine eradicated the disease in the Americas. On the other hand, you have to admit there are many, many other required vaccines that don’t have nearly the same success.

Vaccine stocks trembled at the nomination. 

But that’s not all. RFK wants to go after the food industry as well. When the sugar lobby sponsored studies that effectively made fat the main culprit where heart disease goes, the American way of life started to change. 

We got sicker. 

And fatter. 

And required more — wait for it — pharmaceutical interventions to keep us healthy. 

We think RFK might be onto something. How much progress he’ll make remains to be seen. But this shake up in the health industry may be offering some opportunities for investors. One notable one… Adidas (OTC: ADDY.Y). 

Everyone knows Adidas. They’re the popular runner up to Nike. (Who’ve been having their own troubles over the past couple years.) And now with a focus on health coming back into the picture with this administration, they could well benefit. 

The company falls into the “consumer discretionary” category which typically performs better during good economic times. Their most recent earnings report (Q2 2024) beat estimates with earnings rising 11%. Additionally the company raised its guidance for all of 2024 expecting operating profits to reach €1 billion up from €700 million. 

Given the recent pullback, they have moved to a better valuation level.

Adidas v. Nike (1 Year)

Source: Barchart

And in addition to shoe sales, Adidas’ lifestyle and performance businesses are also seeing signs of growth.

Given these developments, Adidas could be worth a look to get your portfolio in shape.

On August 30, Warren Buffett — the one and only Oracle of Omaha — turned 94!

Ninety-four!!

His former business partner, Charlie Munger, left this earth nearly a year ago at the age of 99!

Is it something about being connected to Berkshire Hathaway that adds candles to leadership’s birthday cakes?

Who knows. But in his 70-some years at the helm, his (and Munger’s) rules for investing have amassed an investment juggernaut that investors have looked to emulate over the decades. 

But now things appear to be changing…

Buffett’s Fire Sale?

Buffett, who still actively manages Berkshires’ portfolio, has been a net seller of stocks for the past eight quarters, significantly rearranging his portfolio. Here’s the rough breakdown of recent sales according to US News:

He sold over 380 million shares of Apple (AAPL) reducing his position by over 49%. He dumped 104 million shares of Bank of America (BAC) shaving 10% off that position. He pitched 2.6 million shares of Capital One (COF) taking that position down 21%. And finally he sold 4.3 million shares of Chevron (CVX).

He unloaded his entire holdings of Snowflake (SNOW) — a cloud based data storage and management facility — and the media, streaming and entertainment company Paramount Global (PARA).

But while he’s been a net seller, there have been additions to his portfolio. He increased his holdings of Occidental Petroleum (OXY) 7.2 million shares and Chubb Ltd. (CB) by 1.1 million shares.

Plus he added two new holdings in Ulta Beauty (ULTA) and aerospace, defense and electronics manufacturer Heico Corp. (HEI).

The company also stopped buying back its BRK.B shares this year as well.

Add it all up and Buffett has raised Berkshire’s cash position to $320 billion versus just $272 billion in stocks. 

What the Heck is He Thinking?

That is, of course, the $64,000 question.

Buffett has been nothing but legendary in his investing smarts for longer than many investors today have been alive. Since 1965 when he took over Berkshire, he grew the value of the company by 19.8% annually through 2023. 

Frankly, we can’t think of anybody who comes close to that.

So is the man who buys “great companies at fair values” (something he learned from Munger) and holds them forever signaling some sort of change in the air? 

He’s not saying. Or at least what he is saying isn’t satisfying a lot of people.

As Buffett told the Berkshire faithful: “If I’m looking at a 21% rate this year and then we’re [paying] a lot higher percentage later on, I don’t think you’ll actually mind the fact later on that we sold a little Apple this year.”

Selling for tax purposes is a legitimate legitimate reason. But coming from the guy who, for years, has lamented that he pays less in taxes than his employees do…

In 2011, Buffett wrote an op-ed in the New York Times called “Stop Coddling the Super-Rich.” In the article, Buffett said that his taxes amounted to “only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office.

And even going further according to CNN in 2013…

Buffett has been advocating for a minimum tax on top wage earners — those like himself who benefit from the fact that capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than regular earnings. His proposal, popularly known as the Buffett rule, has the support of the Obama administration but is strongly opposed by Republicans in Congress.

…well, that’s a bit rich. 

But there are other reasons to consider Buffett’s actions. From Reuters:

“Berkshire is a microcosm of the broader economy,” said Cathy Seifert, an analyst at CFRA Research in New York. “Its hoarding cash suggests a ‘risk-off’ mindset, and investors may worry what it means for the economy and markets.”

Is the Oracle calling a top? It’s certainly not impossible. Buffett is the king of buying value — great companies fairly priced. If valuations are exceeding what he deems reasonable, he may be building a cash store to take advantage of a major correction.

That said, it’s important to realize that Buffett is NOT, and has NEVER been, a market timer. The rally could easily continue for another six months or even a year.

Then again, he may have other intentions in mind — like building cash to acquire another target company in a massive deal.

Speculating is all well and good, but the truth is we won’t know until something happens. 

In the meantime, we’re keeping an eye on the Oracle.

Trust us… They’ll be screaming that it’s all because of Trump’s tariffs.

But it won’t.

We’re referring to a potential resurgence of inflation.

For months leading up to the election, when they weren’t blasting him as the second coming of Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini…

Source: The Atlantic

…the Democrat side blasted his tariff talk as an outright financial assault on Americans.

“It would be a sales tax on the American people,” she [Harris] said in an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday. “You don’t just throw around the idea of just tariffs across the board, and that’s part of the problem with Donald Trump… He’s just not very serious about how he thinks about some of these issues.”

They’ll want you to believe that any uptick in prices will be all on him. But should inflation begin to reheat, you need to know that it’s been building for some time.

Inflation is Under Control

The Consumer Price Index came out last week and the numbers were reported in line across the board. 

The headline number was up 2.6% year-over-year in line with estimates but 0.2% higher than the previous month’s report. The infamous “core” measure (minus food and energy costs) hit expectations and was flat from the previous yearly reading.

The media rushed to emphasize this was all good news…

Source: The Wall Street Journal

The only problem is that the core number is stuck at 3.3%.

If you buy the Fed’s talk about them seeing inflation back under control so they can start moving rates back to neutral, you’d be hard pressed not to notice that the core reading hasn’t been below 3% since March 2021

Ordinarily the talking heads try to explain away any high print in CPI by saying “well look at the core measure” and blaming it on food and energy prices. It’s true, those prices are volatile. And when they’re pressuring the headline index higher, it’s a legitimate observation. 

But when the opposite happens, like now, it’s just as legitimate. 

In fact, for the past several months, it has been food and energy prices that have been pressuring the index lower. And when you take them out you get a clearer picture of the overall price situation as it stands.

Prices are stubbornly stuck well above the 3% level. Which, in inflation terms, is nowhere near the 2% level the Fed views as its mandate.

That’s called persistent inflation.

And it’s a problem.

Or Is It?

Two days after the Journal headline trumpeted that everything on the inflation front was still A-OK, Jay Powell came out at a speech in Dallas and dumped cold water on it.

Source: CNBC

“The economy is not sending any signals that we need to be in a hurry to lower rates,” Powell said in remarks for a speech to business leaders in Dallas. “The strength we are currently seeing in the economy gives us the ability to approach our decisions carefully.”

Remember that three years ago, as prices were accelerating like a Space X super heavy rocket, the Fed (and that sage of the Treasury, Janet Yellen) all insisted that it was “transitory.” Not long after scraping that egg off their face, the FOMC kicked rate hikes into high gear. 

After doing nothing for two whole years and watching inflation skyrocket to 9.1%, they want you to believe that their massive rate hike of three-quarters of one percent was the thing that struck fear into the heart of rising prices and brought inflation to heel.

Source: The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

It wasn’t. (Businesses reopened and the broken supply chain worked itself out.)

But when you consider that all the indexes in the CPI are subject to “seasonal adjustments,” that the data doesn’t account for costs like interest rates, homeowners insurance, shrinkflation and other assorted rising costs, that financial conditions (according to the Chicago Fed’s National Financial Conditions Index) were never meaningfully tightened and that money supply (M2) is back on the rise looking to test its all-time high of $21.7 trillion you get the idea that we’re not out of the inflation woods by a long shot.

The inflation beast is something that’s been developing for the past three years. If it takes a turn back to the upside — which is a possibility — it shouldn’t be on Trump.

It’s finally over…

After enduring months of some of the most incredible political theater ever exhibited, including two assassination attempts on a candidate, the citizens of the US finally stepped up and made their voices heard. And boy did they ever.

In what can only be described as the comeback of all time (unless you’re a member of the Grover Cleveland Fan Club), Donald Trump won the presidency in undeniable fashion.

And not only did he win, Republicans also took back control of the Senate — and are gaining ground in the House.

This was a remarkable red wave. The kind that gives the winning candidate a mandate to enact their policies. And since Trump now has that mandate, it’s probably worth taking a look at what the next four years (two years with a friendly congress) might bring for the economy and markets…

Stocks

There was no mistaking the stock market’s opinion of Trump’s victory. The day after the election, the Dow Industrials rallied over 1,400 points. The S&P 500 soared over 130. The Nasdaq composite was up over 500. And the Russell 2000 (the index of small to mid-cap companies) saw the highest percentage gain of all the averages exploding over 120 points. 

The initial explanation is simple: Trump will be a pro-business president. 

You can expect Trump to bring a lighter regulatory touch to his next term. He’s also indicated his preference for lower interest rates (a point of contention with us). This bias should benefit tech where AI (and crypto) are concerned as well as the energy sector. 

Inflation

This is a tough one. Because in all honesty, no one administration can be blamed for the inflationary forces in the economy. 

Inflation isn’t a bug within our financialized economy, it’s a feature. One of the “mandates” of the Federal Reserve is to maintain price stability. They define that as maintaining (creating!) 2% inflation every year. That may not sound like much but it shows up as a 22% increase in prices over the course of 10 years. Nothing compared to what the economy experienced over the last four, but the point is prices rarely ever go down.

Of course the fiscal side of the ledger carries a lot of blame as well. Deficit spending, theoretically a cure for a struggling economy (not one that’s booming like they tell us ours is), has an inflationary impact on the economy. Thanks to Congress, the US deficit has been running rampant for the last two decades. And given the fact that they suspended the debt ceiling over a year ago, it’s hard to see how anyone can make much of an impact here.

The Federal Deficit

Source: The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

It’s finally over…

After enduring months of some of the most incredible political theater ever exhibited, including two assassination attempts on a candidate, the citizens of the US finally stepped up and made their voices heard. And boy did they ever.

In what can only be described as the comeback of all time (unless you’re a member of the Grover Cleveland Fan Club), Donald Trump won the presidency in undeniable fashion.

And not only did he win, Republicans also took back control of the Senate — and are gaining ground in the House.

This was a remarkable red wave. The kind that gives the winning candidate a mandate to enact their policies. And since Trump now has that mandate, it’s probably worth taking a look at what the next four years (two years with a friendly congress) might bring for the economy and markets…

Stocks

There was no mistaking the stock market’s opinion of Trump’s victory. The day after the election, the Dow Industrials rallied over 1,400 points. The S&P 500 soared over 130. The Nasdaq composite was up over 500. And the Russell 2000 (the index of small to mid-cap companies) saw the highest percentage gain of all the averages exploding over 120 points. 

The initial explanation is simple: Trump will be a pro-business president. 

You can expect Trump to bring a lighter regulatory touch to his next term. He’s also indicated his preference for lower interest rates (a point of contention with us). This bias should benefit tech where AI (and crypto) are concerned as well as the energy sector. 

Inflation

This is a tough one. Because in all honesty, no one administration can be blamed for the inflationary forces in the economy. 

Inflation isn’t a bug within our financialized economy, it’s a feature. One of the “mandates” of the Federal Reserve is to maintain price stability. They define that as maintaining (creating!) 2% inflation every year. That may not sound like much but it shows up as a 22% increase in prices over the course of 10 years. Nothing compared to what the economy experienced over the last four, but the point is prices rarely ever go down.

Of course the fiscal side of the ledger carries a lot of blame as well. Deficit spending, theoretically a cure for a struggling economy (not one that’s booming like they tell us ours is), has an inflationary impact on the economy. Thanks to Congress, the US deficit has been running rampant for the last two decades. And given the fact that they suspended the debt ceiling over a year ago, it’s hard to see how anyone can make much of an impact here.

The Federal Deficit

Source: The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

In 2018 and 2019, Trump levied tariffs on products valued at roughly $380 billion. 

But as you can see in the chart above, inflation remained fairly stable (even declining into 2019). 

That said, the economy was doing better back then than it is today. The ISM Purchasing Manager Indexes for both manufacturing and services were well above the 50 threshold signaling business growth. Today, services are still intact while manufacturing has slipped to more contractionary levels.

A weaker economy might not react as well.

There are other Trump policies the economy will be facing — especially in the area of geopolitics. 

We’ll consider them in future posts.

Is Apple waving the white flag?

The recent news about its mixed reality headset — the Vision Pro — might have some investors wondering. 

A little more than a year after Apple launched the product (to mixed fanfare) tech news site The Information reported:

In recent weeks, Apple has told Luxshare, which is responsible for the Vision Pro’s final assembly, that it might need to wind down its manufacturing in November, according to an employee at the Chinese manufacturer. Luxshare is making around 1,000 Vision Pro units a day, down from a peak of around 2,000 units a day, the employee said.

Source: The Information

There is, of course, a reason for this. Nobody wants to spend $3,500 for a device that doesn’t run what you want it to. According to the WSJ:

There has been a significant slowdown in new apps coming to the Vision Pro every month. Only 10 apps were introduced to the Vision App Store in September, down from the hundreds released in the first two months of the device’s launch, according to analytics firm Appfigures.

As of August, Apple said it had 2,500 apps developed for the headset. If that sounds like a lot, consider the Apple Watch had some 10,000 apps less than six months after its launch. And the iPhone had 50,000 apps developed for it in the year following its release. 

And as far as the competition goes, Meta is quietly dominating in the headset market…

The social-media company is a formidable competitor to Apple, with a market share of all headsets reaching 74% in the second quarter this year, according to Counterpoint Research.

So is this a misstep for the mighty Apple?

Don’t Sell Your Shares Just Yet…

Apple has a knack for finding its place in the market. Consider its last big release…  The Apple Watch.

Digital watches aren’t exactly a new thing. In fact, they’ve been around since the 1970s. For those of you old enough to remember, we give you the Hamilton Pulsar P1 Limited Edition…

(BTW, that baby cost $2,100 in 1972 — that’s nearly $16,000 today!)

This breakthrough was followed by calculator watches, game watches, camara watches, even TV watches.

By the time Apple rolled out their watch in 2015, high tech timepieces had largely become passé. Instead, everyone was doing everything on their personal devices (i.e. their phones) including checking the time. Who on earth would need an Apple Watch?

Despite that looming reality, Apple was undeterred. They put out the slickest product they could — an all new interface with all kinds of apps for all kinds of (silly) purposes (like showing you where all the planets in the solar system were at any given moment).

But a few years later, the health and fitness market started taking off.  And the Apple Watch became the perfect wearable for it. 

Today, despite the growing competition in the wearables market, Apple has become the dominant player. During the first three quarters of 2023, the company sold 26.7 million units which gave them a 30% share of the global smartwatch market. (Industry leader by a mile.) 

So at the risk of sounding like Apple fanboys, while the news from Apple is disappointing at the moment, the Vision Pro game is far from over…