The bogeyman of AI stocks has been summoned.

In late January, Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek released an open source Large Language Model rivaling OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and Meta’s Llama.

The LLM, which was supposedly developed in only a few months with a budget under $6 million, is significantly more efficient than competitors and, consequently, 20 to 50 times cheaper to use than OpenAI’s o1 model.

The stock market’s reaction to the DeepSeek release was immediate, and, for a hot minute, there was blood in the streets on stocks even tangentially related to AI.

Tech darling Nvidia’s (NASDAQ: NVDA) shares plummeted nearly 18%, marking the largest single-day loss in its history and setting a new record for the biggest one-day loss for a single company in U.S. stock market history, erasing approximately $465 billion from Nvidia’s market cap.

The day’s other big losers included Vistra Corp (NYSE: VST), an electricity generation conglomerate with significant nuclear power holdings, and Arista Networks (NYSE: ANET), a purveyor of (among other things) cloud networking services for large AI data centers.

As if that wasn’t enough for the poor, beleaguered markets …

… after a small bounce back, additional volatility hit the market later that week as President Trump announced tariffs on trade with Mexico, Canada and China.

The tariff threat was later rolled back (for now) … but many retail investors are still reeling from the amount of uncertainty injected into the markets in a relatively short period.

So what’s the best way to take advantage of the trend?

3 Ways to Play a Crazy Market

If you’re looking to protect your portfolio while still capturing upside, you have a few options.

1. Defend

When markets get choppy, stable, dividend-paying stocks could help smooth out the ride.

Companies that sell essential products or services like food, beverages, and personal products tend to weather stock-market hurricanes with a reassuring stability.

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) is a classic example. With its mix of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and consumer health products, JNJ has reliably provided investors with a port in the storm for decades.

Plus, with a 3% dividend yield and a low beta of 0.55, it provides reliable income and lower volatility — an excellent safe harbor in turbulent times.

Another “classic” example would be one of Warren Buffett’s favorite investments — Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO). This beverage behemoth has provided Buffett with stunning returns in the vicinity of 2,437% over the last few decades … while providing up to $700 million in dividends annually.

Neither stock dramatically outperforms the S&P until you zoom your chart out to 30+ years … but then again, the S&P doesn’t pay dividends.

If you are looking for longer-term, reasonably reliable gains while also receiving an income from dividends, playing “defense” could be a good strategy for your portfolio.

2. Parry

In fencing terms, a “parry” is a move that both defends and sets up for an attack … and that might be just the right move for a certain type of investor when the market’s going nuts.

This type of investor might consider using that volatility to their advantage by “buying the dip” when a high performing stock with solid fundamentals suddenly lurches downward.

In the DeepSeek panic noted above, several solid companies plunged more than 15% … but a few days later two of the three had rebounded as much as 20% from trough to peak.

Investors who kept their wits about them during the chaos of trading on January 28 had the opportunity to pick up some well performing, large cap stocks at a pretty decent discount and see an immediate ROI.

This is a more aggressive play, so be cautious as you are doing your due diligence on a potential investment; more than one investor has bled trying to catch a falling knife.

3. Attack

The most aggressive play — the high risk, high reward option — is to lean into the volatility and try to seek out an aggressive growth stock in the sector that’s primed to deliver outsized returns.

For example, President Trump’s outspoken desire to unleash American energy as a tool for American prosperity has the potential to dramatically affect the domestic oil and gas landscape.

His “Drill, baby, drill!” rhetoric hasn’t yet moved the needle for major producers like Chevron (NYSE: CVX), Occidental Petroleum (NASDAQ: OXY) or ExxonMobile (XOM) … but some smaller producers like Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ: PROP) have seen dramatic double-digit stock growth over the last month.

The growth isn’t the only thing dramatic about Prairie’s chart. The more observant readers will notice that the swings between company’s peaks and troughs are significantly larger than the bigger producers … but in that volatility lies the potential for what could be explosive growth.

Warning: Math Ahead

As of this writing, the stock is sitting around $8.60 with a $197.38 million market cap. The company released a 2025 EBITDA forecast between $100 million and $140 million and capex estimated at roughly $100 million for 2025. Additionally, the company has relatively low debt.

Based on a valuation formula called the Enterprise Multiple, some back-of-the-napkin math indicates that the company is currently trading at a 1.58x-2.21x multiple.

What does this mean?

It suggests that PROP is potentially undervalued compared to its peers — trading at a relatively low multiple compared to the broader oil and gas industry, which typically sees EV/EBITDA multiples between 4x and 8x.

If the company’s stock starts trading more in line with the industry average, the market cap could shoot up anywhere between $396 million to $1.096 billion.

That’s a huge range … and it’s not guaranteed that Prairie will ever hit those lofty heights.

But with Trump shouting from the rooftops that American energy is going to see a renaissance … this company could potentially be an aggressive investor’s vehicle to fairly significant returns.

The bottom line?

No matter how you choose to play market turmoil — defend, parry or attack — volatility isn’t necessarily something to fear …

… It’s something you could potentially profit from.

Make a plan, do your due diligence, then execute.

The FOMC is closed out 2024 this week.

While humbly bragging that inflation is well under control, they’ve set off in search of more “neutral” interest rate levels to ward off any slowdown in the economy.

Most media will tell you that they have spectacularly engineered the elusive “soft landing.” And that you don’t realize how good you’ve got it!

Others would beg to disagree..

They’ll point out Donald Trump won the White House in pretty amazing fashion based on the fact that Bidenomics and the economy it created both sucked.

Each camp comes to their conclusion based on the measuring stick they use.

And there’s more than one way to measure an inflation monster…

Welcome to “Sticky-ville”

As if there weren’t enough ways to demonstrate how badly the economy is treating you, the Atlanta Fed itself has devised another. It’s called the Sticky-Price CPI.

What is that?

The Atlanta Fed started tinkering with this measure nearly ten years ago. The idea behind it is that some items in the CPI basket change very rapidly in response to economic factors (they’re known as “flexible”) while other items change much more slowly (they’re “sticky”).

The big question on everybody’s mind was whether either of these groups was a better predictor of different drivers of inflation. In other words, was either one a better forecast tool.

After examining the data for a bit, they discovered that half of the categories change their prices every 4.3 months. So they used that as their cut off.

Items with prices that changed more frequently (like, say, tomatoes) were dubbed “flexible” while those that moved less frequently (like coin-operated laundries) fell into the “sticky” basket.

When you plot the two categories, they look pretty much like you’d expect:

But the trillion dollar question was still was either basket a better predictor?

To determine that, they dove into some high-level math. They used something called the root mean squared error (RSME) which is a statistical way to measure how accurate a prediction is.

They compared the RMSE of each basket to the RMSE of the forecast produced from the headline CPI at intervals of one month, three months, 12 months and 24 months out. (We’ll skip the boring math discussion.) What you need to know is that according to the Fed…

A relative RMSE less than 1.0 indicates that the alternative proxy for inflation expectations is more accurate than the headline CPI.

The results were undeniable.

The one month forecasts were all about equal. But, starting with three months out, the sticky and core sticky baskets proved to be better forecasters. And they became even better predictors the further out they went.

Forecasting Trouble

So what are they showing as the FOMC’s year came to a close?

The Atlanta Fed’s sticky-price consumer price index (CPI)—a weighted basket of items that change price relatively slowly—rose 2.4 percent (on an annualized basis) in November, following a 3.6 percent increase in October. On a year-over-year basis, the series is up 3.8 percent.

On a core basis (excluding food and energy), the sticky-price index rose 2.4 percent (annualized) in November, and its 12-month percent change was 3.9 percent.

The year-over-year numbers are double the Fed’s “mandate.”

While their “preferred” inflation gauge, the PCE index, is showing headline inflation around 2.3%, other measures like core CPI which hasn’t been below 3% since April 2021, suggest that things are still not under control.

And considering the Atlanta Fed’s sticky forecasting tool, it may not be for a while.

The Fed has officially embarked on its quest for the holy grail of monetary policy…

Having slain the inflation monster with restrictive rates of 5.5% (or so they say) they must now start easing off the brakes so the rest of the economy doesn’t sputter and die.

The problem is, as Chairman Powell has admitted over and over, they have no idea what “neutral” actually is. (But they assure us, they’ll know it when they see it.)

And despite not knowing where they’re headed, they launched their effort by slashing their target rate by 50 basis points. Pretty much as large as they could go without sparking some panic in the market.

The market, which had been in a solid uptrend since the low in October 2022, driven largely by mega-cap AI stocks, celebrated by continuing its rally.

This policy reversal by the Fed is something the market has been anticipating for some time. And now that the easing cycle is underway, it should continue to please those big players driving the market.

But it should also benefit another segment of the market that has been lagging. And that creates an opportunity for investors…

Rise of the Small Caps

Since the low in October 2022, small cap companies have lagged the bigger players in the market. Take a look at the chart below…

S&P 500 vs Russell 2000

You can see tightly related performance of both the S&P 500 (an index dominated by mega-cap companies) and the Russell 2000 (an index of small-cap companies) into the 2022 low.

Once mega-AI stocks began to drive the rally, the bigger better capitalized stocks took off. Smaller cap stocks, on the other hand, struggled to keep up lagging by over 20%.

That’s one sector that had been significantly impacted by the Fed’s tightening cycle. Now that’s very likely to change.

Why Small-Caps Love Lower Rates

Small cap companies are typically more sensitive to interest rates. One reason is that they tend to be more reliant on external financing to fund their operations and growth.

Huge companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft all have massive cash reserves they can fall back on to fund their strategic plans. Tens of billions have been spent by big tech from their war chests on AI development.

But many smaller companies, companies with market caps in the lower billion dollar range, don’t have that kind of financial ammo. They have to keep their eyes on operations. That means strategic borrowing is much more critical when it comes to things like financing growth and innovation.

Another reason is bottom line profitability.

Smaller-cap companies generally have smaller profit margins than their bigger capitalized cousins. And a higher cost of capital (what they pay to borrow) tends to take a significant bite out of their already-thin bottom line.

With the Fed moving to ease, lower financing costs will ultimately boost many small-cap companies’ bottom lines making them more profitable companies.

And of course, that leads to a third factor in bolstering the fortunes of the small-cap crowd — more profitable companies are more attractive to investors.

Lower interest rates, from an investor perspective, tends to generate what’s known as a “risk on” investment environment. One where funds and other institutional investors will leverage their portfolios by borrowing money to invest in companies they feel have potential for significant returns.

And companies that have the potential for significant returns? Well they’re generally the ones that are undervalued or have been lagging the broader market.

Right now, that’s the small cap sector.

Looking at the chart above, the small-cap sector as a whole has significant room to actually outperform larger-cap competitors.

Some small caps will do better than others. But right now may be the time for savvy investors to start scanning the small-cap universe for significant opportunities.

It accounts for 70% of the country’s GDP.

Consumer spending.

Makes sense. Healthy consumers are obviously necessary for a healthy economy.

But good health isn’t always apparent on the surface. Trouble can be quietly developing under the surface.

Like the heart disease candidate whose arteries are filling with plaque. They may look perfectly fine… until they’re lying on the ground clutching their chest.

Today’s economy is something like that.

Last October, the BEA announced that real GDP rose at an annualized rate of 2.8%.

That is an impressive number.

To take it at face value (much like the Fed has been insisting we do) you’d have to say that the economy, and consumers in particular, are doing just fine. So have another piece of cheesecake.

The reality underlying the situation, however, isn’t so good.

A Shift in Buying Preference

In a broadly healthy economy, a rising GDP should lift all boats. (Or most anyway.) You expect to see retailers posting great numbers across the board. Blood is pumping through those arteries.

But that’s not what has been happening. And it hasn’t been happening for some time…

All the way back in November 2022, the Wall Street Journal reported:

“Walmart gains more shoppers” sounds like good news. But article reported strains in the consumer sector:

The country’s largest retailer by revenue said Tuesday that households continue to face pressure from rising food prices, and lower-income shoppers are eating into savings.

Inflation was still roaring at the time and CPI for that month came in at 7.1%. And you’d expect that kind of news from lower-income shoppers. But what you might not expect…

During the most recent quarter, households earning $100,000 or more helped push Walmart grocery sales higher, executives said.

Sales data had indicated that higher-income consumers had begun to trade down searching for bargains. When inflation begins to reach the middle to upper income brackets, stress is beginning to build.

Still, with prices soaring over 7% annually, it’d be reasonable to argue that most households would be looking to save a buck or two.

But now with inflation “well on track back to 2%,” if you believe the Fed, things should be shifting back to normal. But they’re not.

In fact, they’re going in the opposite direction…

The Trade Down Continues

This November Walmart released its earnings. Not only did they beat revenue and earnings estimates, they raised their forward guidance.

In particular, management noted…

While average transaction growth slowed, customers are buying more at each visit, driving ticket sizes. A lot of that growth was driven by upper-income households making $100,000 a year or more as increasingly more affluent households trade down. That cohort made up roughly 75% of share gains for the quarter.

Two years later, the $100K and up cohort is still shopping at Walmart. And they’re doing it more and more.

This suggests clear strains in the economy. In a recent webinar, Goldman Sachs noted:

Our focus on the webinar centers around discussing high-end and low-end consumers trading down. This phenomenon occurs as macroeconomic headwinds mount, including elevated inflation and high interest rates due to backfiring ‘Bidenomics.’ More importantly, trading down occurs when incomes don’t keep up with inflation or when purchasing power decreases.

So the trade down phenomenon itself is suggesting trouble. But there’s more…

The bargain hunting isn’t carrying across the board.

Target, who released their earnings the same day as Walmart, missed everywhere with their stock dropping 21% on the news.

This suggests that the trade down to discount stores isn’t even widespread. (Even Dollar General collapsed on its latest earnings report.)

The bottom line: The trade down and concentration of retail customers suggests they’re taking a seriously defensive position as economic conditions become more and more uncertain.

Could be tough times ahead.

There’s something to be said for government investments…

They’re stupid.

Nearly every foray into industrial policy by a government ends up creating serious unintended consequences.

But that doesn’t mean they’ll stop trying.

This latest government go-round involving the tech industry will likely be no different.

Launching a Giveaway Program

Quick story… When global governments shut down the world during the pandemic, the US became painfully aware of just how dependent its economy was on foreign production of certain key materials. One notable dependency was in the semiconductor segment.

The shortage that followed sent shockwaves through multiple industries that relied on access to these tech components.

In the face of this realization, the government did what it does best.

It threw money at the problem.

In 2022 the Biden Administration (in cahoots with the US Congress) passed something called the Chips Act. The White House assured us that this $280 billion handout would:

…accelerate the manufacturing of semiconductors in America, lowering prices on everything from cars to dishwashers. It also will create jobs – good-paying jobs right here in the United States. It will mean more resilient American supply chains, so we are never so reliant on foreign countries for the critical technologies that we need for American consumers and national security.

In addition to targeting semiconductor manufacturing capability in the US, it would fund R&D in various “leading edge” technologies. (In other words, technologies that don’t have a viable commercial market of their own.)

One of the first to step up to the trough was the former heavyweight champion of the chip industry — Intel.

_{Source: CNBC}

According to the article:

Intel said it would spend its CHIPS Act funds on fabs and research centers in Arizona, Ohio, New Mexico and Oregon. The company previously announced plans to spend $100 billion on U.S. programs and facilities. Intel has announced a plan to catch up in leading-edge manufacturing by 2026.

Intel’s Ohio fab will cost more than $20 billion and Intel said it is expected to start production in 2027 or 2028. Intel is also expanding manufacturing operations in Arizona and New Mexico. Intel says the projects will create jobs for 20,000 people in fab construction and 10,000 people in chip manufacturing.

The company’s stock popped on the news.

Spending Down a Black Hole?

But that was six months ago. And oh how things have changed.

Early last month, Intel released a disastrous Q2 earnings report. Revenues missed expectations and resulted in a $1.6 billion net loss. EPS came in at $0.02 vs a $0.10 expectation.

The company announced it was suspending the dividend it’s been paying since 1992.

And now rather than creating tens of thousands of jobs, they announced they would be laying off 15,000 beginning this year.

The company’s stock is down over 60% year to date.

Intel Corp. (INTC) Year to Date.

_{Source: Barchart.com}

Intel CEO Pat Gensler said, “Our revenues have not grown as expected — and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low.”

That may be the scariest statement of all.

For all intents and purposes the AI boom has been fueling the market since late 2022. If they’ve missed the bus for the past two years, it’s hard to imagine how they plan to catch up.

Intel has a bit of a history of being on the wrong side of industry trends. (Like when it opted not to provide Apple with chips for its iPhone.)

There’s always hope to right the ship. (Meta managed to do it after a disastrous investment in the metaverse.) But right now, Intel is nowhere near equipped to spend $100 billion on anything.

And given all this, is this where the government should be spending $20 billion of your money?

Today’s investing landscape may be as difficult to navigate as it’s ever been.

This is in large part due to changes that have taken place over the past decades.

Two important distinctions investors should be aware of today.

First…

The Stock Market Is Not the Economy…

Not so long ago, when the US economy was a value-based engine, the stock market could be considered a decent measure of economic activity.

Manufacturing companies who produced and sold more products earned more money. And investors in those companies were rewarded with higher share prices and often dividend payouts.

Everyone’s a winner.

Today we no longer live in a traditional value-based economy. Sure, we have industries that produce stuff that’s sold here and around the world. But more and more that continues to change.

Today, and for the past roughly 50 years, the stock market has turned from a measure of an industrial economy into a tool of financial elites.

A means to make money from money. Period.

If you want the big picture, think of the golden age of the corporate raider — the time associated with the “Go-Go 80s” and personified by Gordon Gekko in the movie Wall Street.

The strategy back then was to acquire distressed manufacturing companies and drain whatever cash flow they could. Corporate raiders cut capital and operating expenditures and sold off assets. In the immortal words of Gekko himself, they’d wreck a company “because it’s wreckable!”

It wasn’t about investing to grow a company. It was about spending money for a fast return.

But the financialization wasn’t limited to the corporate vultures.

Manufacturing companies themselves even got in on the “make money from money” craze.

General Motors Acceptance Corporation and Ford Motor Credit were both established decades ago to finance car purchases. But during that same time they began to expand their interests into all sorts of other financial services including mortgages, insurance, banking and commercial finance.

Their financial efforts eventually began to eclipse their main businesses…

In 2004, GM reported that 66 percent of its $1.3 billion quarterly profits came from GMAC; while a day earlier, Ford reported a loss in its automotive operation but $1.17 billion in net income, mostly from its financing operation.

Today, stock buybacks are all the rage.

After a shaky start earlier this year, Apple announced it would buy back $110 billion of its shares. Without changing a thing in its operations, its share price suddenly exploded making them once again the most valuable company in the world.

Much of the stock market has become addicted to this financialization. And that’s why cheap capital (low interest rates) is so important.

This is an important fact to understand. Stock indexes do NOT represent the economy.

…And Neither Are Economic Reports

The second thing to understand is that “economic reports” don’t accurately represent the economy either.

Case in point.

GDP for the second quarter was just revised upwards to 3% — over doubling the first quarter’s report of 1.4% growth.

If you believe these numbers, business should be booming.

Yet in the first half of this year, corporate bankruptcies are soaring.

According to the June S&P Global Market Intelligence report: “The 346 total filings so far in 2024 is also higher than any comparable figure in the prior 13 years.”

Personal consumption expenditures (the fancy name for consumer spending) rose 0.7% in the second quarter as well. But sales numbers for many consumer-facing companies like General Mills…

MINNEAPOLIS – General Mills (NYSE: NYSE:GIS) has confirmed its financial targets for fiscal year 2025, expecting organic net sales to be flat to up 1 percent, and an adjusted operating profit ranging from a 2 percent decline to flat in constant currency.

…Hershey…

The stock of iconic US chocolate maker Hershey tumbled after the company slashed its sales and earnings outlook for the year as shoppers continue to reduce purchases of higher priced chocolates and candies.

Q2 sales plunged 17% to $2.07 billion, sharply missing the $2.31 billion estimate. Adjusted EPS of $1.27 per share also missed expectations.

…even dollar stores…

Shares of Dollar Tree plunged nearly 12% in premarket trading in New York after the discount retailer, which operates thousands of stores nationwide, posted fiscal second-quarter earnings that fell short of Wall Street expectations. The company also slashed its full-year outlook, pointing to mounting financial pressures on middle-income and higher-income customers. This comes less than a week after major rival Dollar General reported a “financially constrained core customer” that sent shares crashing the most on record.

…have been struggling as well.

And then there are all the jobs that have been added to the economy…

Today, given all the potential for revisions and seasonal adjustments, economic reports really don’t mean much where the future of a stock — or even an entire index — goes.

Heck, they don’t even accurately represent the economy.

These financial and economic “dislocations” can create havoc for investors.

But we make them our business here, to make sure our readers are the best-informed investors they can be.